В совершенно левой Калифорнии проголосовали, тем не менее, против Proposition 16 ("Repeals a constitutional provision that made it unlawful for California's state and local governments to discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to people based on race, ethnicity, national origin or sex.").
Что тоже не может не радовать. (Хотя перевес и не очень большой - на данный момент 56% vs 44%.)
Вот вся продажа этой дури на это и упирала. Такой специальный аргумент для тех, кто не в состоянии заглянуть внутрь предлагаемой поправки и представить себе последствия.
income above $250,000 would have been taxed at higher rates, income between $100,000 and $250,000 would generally have remained taxed at 4.95 percent, and income below $100,000 would generally have been taxed at lower rates.
no subject
Date: 2020-11-04 07:35 pm (UTC)Что тоже не может не радовать. (Хотя перевес и не очень большой - на данный момент 56% vs 44%.)
no subject
Date: 2020-11-04 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-11-04 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-11-04 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-11-04 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-11-05 07:07 am (UTC)income above $250,000 would have been taxed at higher rates, income between $100,000 and $250,000 would generally have remained taxed at 4.95 percent, and income below $100,000 would generally have been taxed at lower rates.
Классический прогрессивный налог.