http://chasovschik.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] chasovschik.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] chasovschik 2016-02-12 01:15 am (UTC)

Погуглил, прямо в Вашей формулировке.

Первая ссылка: (http://www.creators.com/conservative/phyllis-schlafly/why-did-ted-cruz-win-the-texas-primary.html)

To the surprise of the pundits, pollsters and predictors who think they are smarter than the rest of us, Ted Cruz won the nomination for U.S. Senator from Texas. A few months ago, he rated only 2 percent in the polls, but in the primary runoff, he coasted to a 14-point win.

His victory wasn't because he had more money or more prestigious endorsements or more valuable connections or more political experience. Maybe he defeated the establishment-backed candidate because he touched some hot-button issues that the grassroots care about but are ignored or even belittled by the mainstream media.

Вторая ссылка на Вики: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz)

Cruz ran for the Senate seat vacated by fellow Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, and in July 2012 defeated Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst during the Republican primary runoff, 57%–43%. Cruz then defeated former state Representative Paul Sadler in the November 2012 general election, winning 56%–41%.

Это мне показалось странным, потому что я помню про 16%. Проверил. Оказалось, 56.4% на 40.6%, то есть они округляли результаты, а я - разницу. Неважно, впрочем, как ни округляй - landslide.

А Вы где гуглили, если не секрет?


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting