plus, this is not about PROSECUTION. or CRIME. so the guy is a kinky sorry shithead. it is no crime. she consented, then she did not like his perversions, and left. no crime, dunno why she wants "assault" charges now.
but it is about moral character. we do want our judges to be clean. disgusting details, when they bubble up, do become relevant for his retaining or firing. methinks.
does what those two women describe go under "domestic violence"? i don't think so. a paraphilia, yes. i don't want judges with paraphilias at the bench, no thanks. if it was innocent, like that poor guy who broke into neighbour's house to hide for soiled panties - same deal.
not fit to judge people and send them to prison or not.
no subject
but it is about moral character. we do want our judges to be clean. disgusting details, when they bubble up, do become relevant for his retaining or firing. methinks.
does what those two women describe go under "domestic violence"? i don't think so. a paraphilia, yes. i don't want judges with paraphilias at the bench, no thanks. if it was innocent, like that poor guy who broke into neighbour's house to hide for soiled panties - same deal.
not fit to judge people and send them to prison or not.